Every once in a while, a film comes along that manages to sink its cinematic hooks deep inside the viewer, offering up a weird through the looking glass version of certain archetypal shared experiences. Director James Ponsoldt’s The Spectacular Now, a sort of postmodern Ferris Bueller’s Day Off-esque coming-of-age story, is one of those films. It’s thanks in large part to the, well, spectacular performances from leads Miles Teller and Shailene Woodley, but, moreover, it’s from the pitch-perfect script from 500 Days of Summer scribes Michael Weber and Scott Neustadter which hearkens back to a simpler era of teen movies from auteurs like Cameron Crowe and John Hughes. Recently, at the film’s Los Angeles press day, I sat down with the dynamic writing duo to talk about their fascination with rocky relationships, crafting an old school character for the modern era and the pros and cons of living in the moment.
Nerdist: You guys seem to have fascinations with breakups and relationships. Where does this come from?
Michael Weber: Immaturity.
Scott Neustadter: I think collectively weâve now gone through a lot more of that. Me more recently and you [Weber] a while back. We seem to have traded lives at one point where you were single for a while and I was in a relationship and then I was single for a while and youâre married.
MW: I have a kid now. Iâm not interested in relationships at all. [laughter] The interesting thing about it, I think, is that what movies that are good arenât about relationships and arenât about two people figuring it out? I think we sort of always gravitate towards stories about young people having their eyes opened somehow. Be it in a bad relationship where itâs all your fault or if itâs something like this, where itâs a kid at the precipice of adulthood but doesnât wanna go there and thereâs no way to stop it. Itâs an interesting thing: when we read the novel, we thought, âthis is really cool,â and itâs an opportunity to sort of bring back the teen, young love movies we grew up and liked so much.
N: Yeah, that was one of the things I really enjoyed about this. I think for the last decade or so, weâve had all these movies that are ostensibly marketed to young adults but are just not relatable. Itâs just like, hot kids with werewolves and vampires. This felt like a return to the John Hughes/Cameron Crowe style of movie.
MW: The stuff we love!
SN: Right, and I think it mirrors in some ways the business has changed. Will this play internationally? Whatâs the trailer gonna look like? How are we gonna market this? We never write like that. When you read a book, itâs like, does it excite us? Do we fall in love with it?
MW: If you tell your story about Oklahoma City. I mean, we talked to a girl and asked, âWhatâs your favorite teen movie?â
SN: This is amazing. In the library of a high school in Enid, Oklahoma. In the middle of nowhere. And her response?
MW: Harry Potter.
SN: Sheâs 16. This was three years ago. And that was her favorite movie about teenagers ever. And that was for us, in some ways, thatâs why we have to make this. We grew up with all these amazing Cameron Crowe and John Hughes characters and these other movies.
MW: I like to think of it as this: They used to make movies as both the escapist versions where you can have fantastical experiences but also the relatable ones. And the relatable ones are gone. They donât make them anymore. They donât exist. And so, in the same way, we were so frustrated with the romantic comedy genre and we were like, letâs just go to town on that. We kind of were like, this is our opportunity.
SN: But itâs nice because, you know, Perks of Being a Wallflower found an audience last year. In a few weeks, weâre about to start shooting The Fault in Our Stars. Obviously, as a book, thatâs found a huge audience. So it seems like maybe these kinds of movies are making a comeback.
N: Yeah, I definitely think that thereâs some, not pushback per se, but people want something thatâs more relatable, more tied to their experiences and I think that you guys accomplished that successfully in Spectacular Now.
MW: Exactly, yeah. That was definitely involved.
SN: Thanks. Really.
N: So with Sutter, I got this sort of post-modern Ferris Bueller vibe where heâs this fun asshole but he gets more called out on his shit than Ferris Bueller ever would.
MW: His influence on his friends, when Ferris Bueller gets his friends to do stuff, itâs always positive. Like crashing the car, even that’s a good thing, right? But we were like, in real life, thatâs probably not exactly right.
N: [laughs] No, someoneâs life is probably ruined.
MW: So itâs interesting to us to sort of examine the guy who has that sort of charisma and that sort of influence on his friends, but his influence is not necessarily all positive. In the novel and in the script and actually maybe more so than in the movie, his influence on Amy starts to be pretty reprehensible. Starts to have a lot of darker undertones. Shailene is a strong actress and a strong person, and so like her attitude towards the character was a lot more like, âI like him and Iâm willing to go up to a point but I wonât go to the disastrous places that the novel does.â
N: Yeah, you can see it come through at the beginning when sheâs like âI donât really drinkâ and by the end sheâs got her own flask and everything.
MW: Thereâs a DVD extra of one time where she goes overboard. When we all watched it, we were like, “Yeah, no, she wouldnât go that far.” Sheâs too smart for that. That was an interesting thing we learned in the process.
N: Were there any challenges in updating a Ferris Buellerian archetype for a 2013 audience?
SN: I donât think so really. We always try to minimize the amount of computers and technology and texting and all that stuff. Just âcause itâs just not that interesting when youâre in a movie theater watching someone in front of a computer screen.
MW: We talked to [director] James [Ponsoldt] about it actually even in the beginning. Itâs kind of like, letâs never date this. Letâs make it feel like a time that could be any time, you know? Kids are doing what kids do.
SN: The emotions of the movie are certainly timeless. Weâd like to think if youâve ever been a teenager, you will recognize the emotional complexity of those years.
MW: Had we made this with the studio system, there probably would have been a lot more like âYou gotta jazz it up!â or âYou got to make it crazy,â or “whereâs the scene where he and his friend go and do this thing?”
SN: Youâre right, too, because weâve never had to go for a nuanced thing. That age, things arenât so black and white. Thereâs a lot of gray and we never wanna talk down to young people. Everyoneâs so savvy, theyâll smell that.
N: Yeah, theyâll know if theyâre being marketed to or condescended to.
MW: Another reason why it had to be rated R. And why there had to be alcohol and there has to be this stuff. I mean, itâs not so much kids behaving badly, itâs kids behaving the way they behave. Weâre trying our best to not put judgement on it. Weâre now older guys, weâre not kids anymore, but we remember what it was like back then. You never listen to the people who tell you not to do something and thatâs because you learn more on your own and thatâs the approach we took to the whole process.
SN: And at the same time, itâs not really a movie about that stuff. For us, first and foremost, it was always a love story and then just being honest about the things around it.
N: Yeah, I thought you guys were very even-handed in your portrayals of partying and stuff like that. Not glorifying it, itâs just what it is. Itâs what happens.
SN: I think that audience would know if it didnât look right. If everyoneâs drinking soda pop, people would say âwhat is that?â
MW: The point is that we wanted to do a relatable version. You have to go there. You have to do those things.
SN: It was interesting because at one point, when this was a studio movie initially, the studio gave us notes that they wanted things in the party scenes, like âletâs see more things like beer pongâ and âletâs see kids doing these crazy antics, wet t-shirtsâ and those were the studio notes that pushed it to those extreme places. That may or may not be going on, but weâve seen all that. Thatâs not what this is about.
N: Thatâs like the amped up version.
MW: Right. We couldâve used a clip of Project X and just put it in the movie.
N: Yeah, zoom out and theyâre watching it on TV. So, the film presents Sutterâs repeated maxim of âlive in the moment.â On one hand, itâs cool because if you do live in the moment you get all these incredible experiences and memories and youâre just having these adventures, but you also see how itâs a crutch. Itâs a smokescreen. Heâs got this drinking problem, heâs got this past…
SN: You sure you havenât seen the last three minutes of the movie? Because youâre practically quoting some of the voiceover. [laughs]
N: Really? No, I wish. Iâm just very intuitive. [laughs] So yeah, Iâm wondering if you guys could speak a little bit about that theme and where you guys come down on living in the ânow.â Should you? Shouldnât you? A little of both?
MW: I think thereâs a middle ground. Thereâs definitely a way to live in the moment and appreciate whatâs happening to you. At the same time, have an eye towards consequences which this character does not. Heâs so wrapped up in whatâs going on that itâs an absolute crutch for him to never have to face the consequential actions that come after and whatever. For us, I think weâre advocating being open, appreciating whatâs going on but at the same time not closed to the future.
SN: Yeah, I think thatâs simply what becoming an adult is finding that balance. Thereâs a time for everything but itâs never as extreme as it is when youâre a teenager. Your emotions are extreme and your choices are extreme. Becoming an adult is a little more more moderation and a little more balance.
N: Yeah, when youâre a teen, everything is life or death.
MW: Everything. The most dramatic thing, which is fun. Thatâs why we enjoy those characters. You get away with a little bit of extra drama.
SN: I find it cathartic too. My teenage years were a nightmare. This is nice, kind of having this perspective of looking back now and be a little more relaxed about it.
MW: We also really loved the idea that, you know those kids in high school who knew that high school was the best time? And they were always the lamest. Looking back, itâs always really sad. Sutterâs a character who thinks that this is the greatest time but at the same time knows how pathetic that is, how sad that is, but kind of doesnât wanna deal with that fact. So thereâs an undercurrent all the time, even of living in the moment, that this kidâs not happy. Heâs trying his best to be that but he just isnât. At a certain point, thatâs gonna end.
SN: On the flipside, Aimee is a character that knows thereâs more to life than high school. She knows that before Sutter comes into her life. She knows that this is the beginning of her journey and not the destination. She knows that the world is a much larger place than this small town. It was great because when Shailene became involved, which really got this movie going, she had picked up on all that before we had even met and talked to her. She always understood that her approach to this was (that) Aimee is the smartest person in this town. That was her sort of mindset for this character which brought it to life more than just sort of.. Weâve all seen that kind of the shy, mousy girl…
N: You donât want it to be like where she shakes her hair and oh my gosh, it’s this beautiful prom girl. Slow motion-style with the fans blowing and everything.
SN: [laughs] Right.
N: Kyle Chandlerâs in it for a little bit, but he was one of my favorite parts of the movie. Sort of like this Ghost of Christmas Future version of Sutter.
SN: Oh, that casting was just so good.
N: Yeah, that was really spot on. Talk about Kyle’s character. Heâs supposed to be the end point if Sutter just keeps on the path that heâs on?
SN: Sutterâs built up a mythology. He has some issues with his mom in the beginning and thereâs stuff he hasnât worked out, but his dad is kind of this hero because heâs out of the picture. I think itâs just easier for him to deal with that emotionally with his dad not there that. Yeah, my dadâs a pilot or my dadâs this or that rather than face the harsh truth that his dad just didnât want to be there. Obviously, that mythology he built up comes crashing down when he finally gets to see his father again.
MW: And Kyleâs whole approach was… Iâm going there. This is going to be even more distant and…
SN: There were a couple of lines where he was going to give a little bit more of an explanation and Kyle said on set, âI donât believe I owe him anything. I made a choice to stay out of my sonâs life and I think Iâm going too far as if Iâm trying to build a bridge that Iâm not looking forâ and he was right.
MW: We were like, âCoach Taylor, please.â [laughs]
SN: He wanted to take this part and make it more harsh. Which was amazing!
N: I think the line that really did it for me is when they finally show up to his house and heâs just like âOh, you caught me at a bad time. I was just going to meet some friends. I guess you could come.â Â Itâs such a punch to the gut.
MW: Casting wise, that was something that was always important to us. You want somebody when they open the door, you go âOh, this could go right. This could be alright.â If you got a different actor, somebody like all, shady and whatever else, you would open the door and be like âOh, this is not gonna go well.â
N: Fast train to Sadville.
SN: Yeah thatâs something where Kyleâs done and helped us out considering his reputation.
MW: And heâs really like that in real life.
SN: He is!
MW: Heâs just a really good guy.
N: So I just have one last question for you. What would be inside your ideal burrito?
SN: I am allergic to most foods, so my burrito is always just chicken and white rice and nothing else. Not even any sauces. I like the burrito situation, as long as thereâs no beans, no sauces, no condiments, no tomato….
N: So your ideal is something that wouldnât kill you immediately.
SN: Correct.
MW: I love burritos. I love chicken burritos but I was just talking about this last week, which is kind of amazing. Iâve become a huge fan of octopus. Itâs my girlfriendâs favorite food. An octopus burrito would be amazing.
N: Iâve had some sushi burritos recently from some of the more enterprising taco trucks in the city and they’re pretty good, so I’m down with this idea.
SN: Iâm allergic to fish. But you guys keep talking.
N: Yes, Iâm sorry. They also have delightful white rice and their tap water is terrific.
SN: Yes, thatâs one of my favorite staples.
—
The Spectacular Now, written by Michael Weber and Scott Neustadter, is in theaters in Los Angeles and New York now, and in select cities on August 9th. You can also keep up with Michael and Scott on Twitter. Did you see the movie? Let us know what you think in the comments below!