In times such as this, when only last year the perseverance of the human spirit has allowed us to send our most advanced and sophisticated observation robot to the planet Mars to, perhaps, discover more about the incredibly cold planet than has ever been known before, itâs fun to think back on the time for many years when we were simply scared to death of it. Indeed, throughout the 1950s, more movies about death from Mars were made than ever before, causing fear of little green men.
One of the best loved films of the era was William Cameron Menziesâ Invaders from Mars, a flawed yet enjoyable film about a kid who discovers his whole town is slowly being overrun by Martian imposters and no one is to be trusted, even his parents. It was a paranoid thriller with some fun if silly special effects. Then in 1986, Tobe Hooper remade it and it was boring.
Why remake a 1950s allegory to the Communist scare in 1986? Because they could. The âTheyâ in question is none other than Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus, the Israeli cousins who owned ’80s schlock factory Cannon Films — the studio behind such ridiculousness as Sylvester Stalloneâs Cobra, Chuck Norris vehicles like Delta Force and Missing in Action, and even dance movie Breakinâ and its sequel with the infamously great name, Breakinâ 2: Electric Boogaloo.
Invaders from Mars is not nearly as schlocky as these films, and maybe thatâs the problem. It was directed by Tobe Hooper, he of Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Poltergeist, and Lifeforce fame, and, by this point, he was known for utilizing fairly extravagant special effects but could still make a movie on a budget, something Golan and Globus surely relished. The screenplay for the movie was co-written by Alien scribe Dan OâBannon.
The basic story for the two films is remarkably the same; a little boy named David, whose father works on a nearby military base, witnesses an alien spacecraft landing over the hill on the horizon. He runs to tell his parents (Timothy Bottoms and Laraine Newman), and his father decides to go investigate. When he returns in the morning, the father is noticeably different, and David even sees a strange wound on the back of his neck. At school Davidâs teacher (Oscar-winner Louise Fletcher), who already is a huge bitch, is now even bitchier, and she too has a thing on her neck. He catches her eating frogs from formaldehyde, which is a pretty good indication that sheâs an alien. The more people David tells about his suspicions, the more people come back with neck wounds. David follows his teacher into a cave which leads into the Martianâs blood vessel-inspired space ship and sees big-mouthed drones and a leader who is basically Krang from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
The only person he can trust is the schoolâs nurse, Linda, played by Karen Black. Together, David and Linda attempt to warn the General of the military base (James Karen) about what is sure to be a full-on invasion. David and Linda have a borderline creepy relationship. Heâs probably 10 and sheâs easily in her mid-to-late 30s yet they donât speak to each other like a child and a grown up would. As the film progresses, theyâre always holding hands or, if scared, holding each other tightly and basically just donât have a child-guardian thing going on at all. Also, whenever I watch these movies for this feature, I usually choose one actor, whether I mention it or not, who is âThe Worst.â Karen Black easily wins this dubious honor. Her reactions to things are about as unrealistic as itâs possible to be. The whole time itâs like sheâs trying to look scared rather than just looking scared, and, as such, is less subtle than anyone in Silent-era German expressionist cinema.
The creatures and visual effects are all quite good, it has to be said. The designs for the monsters look like something out of Terry Gilliamâs peyote nightmares, and thereâs a consistency in the alien machinery, with the giant burrowing drill looking like a smaller version of the ship itself. I do have a bit of an issue that isnât exclusive to this movie: Aliens are almost always depicted as bestial, insectoid or reptilian with big, cumbersome appendages. How, then, do they pilot a sophisticated spaceship? While we never see how this particular ship is flown, it begs the question how they could possibly make it to other planets or even how they built the damn ship in the first place. In the original film, the alien drones were clearly people in suits, but, oddly, thatâs a little more logical. Regardless….
So the aliens look great in this movie. The real problem is it takes FOREVER to get back to the aliens. This is the filmâs main problem, besides the melodramatic acting, of course. The original Invaders from Mars was a brisk 78 minutes, while this remake is 100 minutes. This isnât necessarily a bad thing, but when the story holds so firmly to the original short source material, it means a lot of padding gets added. The whole second act just seems to drag and drag like itâs just killing time until we can get the army involved. They try to keep the tension up by having Fletcherâs character act as a surrogate terrifying monster, always showing up to chase and terrorize David and Linda and then quickly be gotten rid of for another few minutes. Itâs just so boring. You never feel like anyoneâs in any real peril. Even when characters do die, itâs not really a shock. It just sort of happens.
Thatâs basically what one can say about this version of Invaders from Mars: It just sort of happened. Hooperâs direction and the filmâs design are quite good, but the acting is pretty poor and arch the entire time. If it was supposed to be a spoof or gentle ribbing of 1950s science fiction films, thatâs one thing, but everythingâs presented as reality, so the performances just seem bad in a bad way. And itâs not even an allegory to anything like the original had been. It doesnât say anything. Like most remakes, itâs simply a case of wondering what the point was.
I’m not always a fan of remakes …. but you know Golan and Globus (of Cannon Films) saw what John Carpenter did remaking 1951’s The Thing in 1982 (even if it wasn’t a box office success for Universal) and attempted to do the same on their budget (only borrowing from another 50’s Sci Fi film – in this case? Invaders from Mars!) …
It’s interesting to note the original “open ending” to the 1953 North American theatrical release was changed for British theatres (and given a “yeah we won” ending). Also, the original film’s child star (Jimmy Hunt) plays the part of the police chief in the 1986 remake. It’s funny that you complained about the acting between Karen Black and Hunter Carson, because she is actually his real Mother (the Father is actor, producer, screenwriter, director L. M. Kit Carson) ….
So, why remake a Sci Fi Classic that played upon America’s fear of Communist Enemies? Besides better special effects (courtesy of Stan Winston and John Dysktra), this reworking of an original story from John Tucker Battle (1950) was co-financed by multi-millionaire Wade Williams (a science fiction fan who obtained ownership of the original film from 20th Century Fox back in 1978) ….
LIFEFORCE – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTM0lAiSJ6w
I honestly think Tobe Hooper directed INVADERS FROM MARS (1986) in order to say “sorry” about the lackluster box office for LIFEFORCE (1985 – which is a personal favorite film of mine) to Canon Films and to obtain financial backing for THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE 2 (1986) from Canon Films (by the waym TTCM2 was a box office success and remains another favorite film of mine) ….
THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE 2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyEaYxTI2U
This film was so scary for me when I was a kid that I could not pass our cellar door for many years without running and whistling. Not funny. (Well now it is, but then, … man!)
It was basically a SUPER coked up Tobe Hooper. (From someone who was there)
Man, I got this confused with Strange Invaders. Also featuring Louise Fletcher.
Plus, Strange Invaders has Wallace Shawn. “INCONCEIVABLE!”