close menu

“Iron Man 3” Review: For Tony Stark, the Third Time’s the Charm


 (Note: this review may contain mild spoilers)

The short review: Iron Man 3 isn’t a perfect movie, but it may just be the best Marvel movie yet thanks to its blend of humor, whipsmart dialogue, high octane action, and Shane Black’s slick direction.

The long review: In 2008, Iron Man made waves amongst audiences, not because it was a particularly great movie, but because it was one of, if not the best, translations from comic book to silver screen that they had seen. Thanks in large part to the success of Iron Man, Marvel Studios has grown into a global cinematic juggernaut, creating summer blockbusters left and right and, oh yeah, the third highest grossing movie of all time. The House that Robert Downey Jr. built suffered a bit of a misstep in 2010’s Iron Man 2, a hollow affair that missed the mark and thoroughly wasted Mickey Rourke. Thankfully, the third time is the charm for Tony Stark, thanks in no small part to writer/director Shane Black. Whether this is a Shane Black action-comedy disguised as a Marvel movie or vice versa, the fact remains that Iron Man 3 proves that even after 5 years of the franchise, we aren’t getting too old for this shit.


Based on Warren Ellis’ fan favorite “Extremis” storyline, Iron Man 3 takes place in the present, but is very much mired in the past. Marvel has carefully laid the groundwork for the Mandarin’s inclusion in Iron Man’s third outing, but even the new characters, Guy Pearce’s Aldrich Killian (founder of a little think tank called Advanced Idea Mechanics) and Rebecca Hall’s Dr. Maya Hansen have connections to Tony’s past. Stark has always been the kind of hero who is very much in the moment, using his intellect to come up with solutions on the spot; he’s never been much for introspection, a character flaw which comes to bear in Iron Man 3.

After being spurned by Stark at a tech conference in 1999, Killian has developed a system called Extremis, a nanotech serum which rearranges DNA to repair damaged tissue, and which is quickly employed for more sinister purposes. Unfortunately for the test subjects, the reaction is rather unstable, leading some to overheat and explode in what is sure to be an autocombustophobe’s worst nightmare. Add in a crazed terrorist mastermind with a seeming hard-on for taking down Tony Stark and you’ve got a recipe for disaster (especially if you’re Stark’s Malibu mansion).


In the wake of The Avengers, screenwriters are faced with an inherent problem: how do you reasonably produce a solo hero film without the looming question of “why doesn’t Tony just call his superpowered friends for help?” Shane Black and Drew Pearce neatly circumvent this issue with a simple, smart fix that instantly adds more depth to our put-upon protagonist: Tony is suffering from PTSD from the events that transpired in New York. Prior to The Avengers, Tony was, as far as he knew, the only superpowered kid on the block. The status quo has changed – The Avengers proved that – and now Tony is forced to reconcile his place in the world, his inability to explain the unexplainable (e.g. gods and murderous extraterrestrial armies exist) and the fact that he murdered an entire alien armada with a nuclear weapon. Worst of all, Tony is concerned that he can’t keep the one who matters to him most, Pepper Potts, safe from harm. And if you can’t protect the ones you love, what’s the point of having repulsor beams in the first place?

Iron Man 3 is an action movie, yes, but it forces our charismatic crimefighter to look inward and be more than just the Iron. At the risk of sounding cheesier than a Doritos Locos Taco, he must also figure out what it means to be The Man. Much like DC’s Dark Knight, underneath it all, Tony Stark is just an immensely wealthy man in a cool suit with a lot of toys; he doesn’t possess super strength or a mythic hammer.  At the end of the day, it’s just him and his considerable wits, a fact which Black wisely plays up throughout the film. In fact, the film sees Tony spending more time outside of the suit than inside, a bold choice that pays off by forcing the often egotistical Stark to look inward and find the kind of hero he wants to be. At its heart, Iron Man 3 is a detective story, a fact which can be obscured by some of the more spectacular moments like the incredible final showdown or the much buzzed about “Barrel of Monkeys” sequence.


Robert Downey Jr. may be the technical star of Iron Man 3, but it is Sir Ben Kingsley, playing a more modernized version of Silver Age supervillain The Mandarin, that steals the show. Cutting an imposing figure, Kingsley’s Mandarin is ethnically ambiguous, a fact which he plays up by appropriating cultural symbols from around the world and twisting them to suit his purposes. Dressed like a Chinese warlord, the Mandarin is a chimera of American fears and our conceptions of terrorism, creating propaganda videos starring himself as the ominous, low-voiced face of anti-Americanism. In fact, I would go so far as to say that he’s the best on-screen Marvel villain yet, which is saying something when you compare him to heavyweights like Loki or The Red Skull.

When his casting was first announced, there was a bit of controversy surrounding the decision. In the comics, the Mandarin is of half-British, half-Chinese descent, so it isn’t too far outside the realm of possibility that Marvel cast the British/Indian Kingsley to play the role. Allegations of whitewashing aside, it’s easier to chalk it up to artistic license. Hell, John Constantine is supposed to be a blonde British man, but somehow we wound up with Keanu Reeves. Fortunately, viewers will all but forget about said controversy upon seeing Kingsley’s portayal. Despite the complete lack of laser-shooting alien space rings, Kingsley’s Mandarin cuts an imposing figure, creating a pastiche of our collective fears that rings true.


Regardless of your opinion of Paltrow (what’s in the box?!), her on-screen chemistry with RDJ is undeniable and their love story continues to ring true enough to keep the story moving. Cheadle also shines as Col. Rhodes and is utilized much more effectively than in the comparably limp Iron Man 2. At times, it almost feels like a buddy cop movie starring Iron Patriot and Iron Man, which makes sense considering that Black essentially invented the genre. Unfortunately, the film doesn’t devote quite as much effort into fleshing out Killian and his motivations, but given Pearce’s skill at playing misguided billionaires (‘sup, Weyland-Yutani Corp.?), it is an issue that is quickly forgotten.

With back-and-forth banter, over-the-top explosions, mystery aplenty and, yes, a Christmas scene, this is very much a Shane Black film, but one that touches on some surprisingly prescient issues like homegrown terrorism, the sometimes questionable ethics of massive biotech corporations, and environmentalism. One could even make the case that Don Cheadle’s Iron Patriot, wearing the War Machine armor as the U.S. government’s iron-suited enforcer, is the ultimate example of a manned drone. When crises arise, they send in their flying one-man militia to clean out. It is very much a film of the moment in its themes and the issues upon which it touches, but it’s easy to see how it will remain relevant as time passes. At the same time, it’s an over-the-top action movie with explosions aplenty and superpowered slugfests galore, so it’s easy for some of Black’s more salient points to get drowned out by the Dolby Atmos-powered explosions.


At the end of the day, Iron Man 3‘s best moments lie in its dialogue and its quick, rapid fire character interactions, which are consistently laugh out loud funny, but not in an overly hammy way. In particular, Tony Stark’s repartee with Harley (Ty Simpkins), a pint-sized sidekick who he meets along the way, provide for some of the funniest moments in the film. Normally, my eyes start rolling once they try to introduce a boy wonder into the mix, but Black and Pearce don’t pull their punches, especially when it comes to deadbeat dads. That isn’t to say Iron Man 3 is light on action – it’s not – but it’s refreshing to see a superhero story that gives equal weight to eye-popping explosions as well as the characters causing them.

Although it suffers on occasion from dull moments, uneven pacing and thin characterization, Iron Man 3‘s merits vastly outweigh its flaws, making this a true summer blockbuster and a film worth seeing for those who are interested in seeing the man beneath the suit (and the man inside the suit kicking ass and taking names). If this is to be Downey’s last solo outing as Tony Stark, he’s certainly going out with a bang.

What did you think of Iron Man 3? Let us know in the comments below! Stay tuned to the Nerdist Channel for my behind-the-scenes interviews with the cast and crew on Friday!


How Much Turkey Would You Need to Eat to Get Knocked Out by Tryptophan Alone?

How Much Turkey Would You Need to Eat to Get Knocked Out by Tryptophan Alone?

Sebastian Stan is a

Sebastian Stan is a "Chubby Dumpling" in China and Chris Evans LOVES IT

MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO: A Visual Appreciation

MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO: A Visual Appreciation



  1. RG says:

    Everything you’re describing as flaws are not flaws.

    1) Tony still has to be Tony. He *was* deepened, but now the PTSD is his reason for throwing up that wall of sarcasm. Also, they cut out a subplot about his battle with alcoholism, but I think there’s still tons of subtext there about it: the anxieties over memories of his past life, and the way it continues to come back to bite him while sober… and, speaking from experience, that was f’ing INSIGHTFUL, no question about it.

    2) The suits were different levels of prototypes. Mk42 was the one he had just developed which could come on-command, but its drawback was that it didn’t hold together as well.

    3) How aren’t those last two things valid story points? For Tony, yeah, that’s… kinda the point of it. That’s not actually cynical, that’s a simple morality tale, fairly common to comic book movies. Also, whatever political beef you might have with it, fine, but it’s also about the rejection of materialism… which is certainly something mainstream film could use more of.

  2. buckthorn says:

    It surprises me to see so many positive reactions. It is obvious that this director doesn’t like Tony or Iron Man. His character was not deepened, Tony went from being cynical and sarcastic to just flippant and rather shallow. There was so much illogic, with his suits just falling apart when they collide with something one minute, and holding together when crashing through things the next. The director had a cynical agenda here. In this story, Tony got what he deserved for rejecting the physically lame visionary at the start of the movie, and the U.S. got what it deserved for the same reason in the mind of this bitter director with career issues of his own.

  3. RG says:

    If you love the comics already, you know the Mandarin is awesome. However, if you’re not already familiar with him, I’m sorry, but he’s just… embarrassing. The course they took was really making a point, painful to some big fans of the comics, yes, but ultimately necessary for the continued relevance of comic book movies.

    My only real gripe is the continuity problem created by planting the seed of the whole Ten Rings thing in Iron Man 1, and not following through on it. I support the political reasons for that, because we don’t need more movies which vilify middle-easterners, but it DOES grate on the strict continuity nerd in me.

  4. Big C says:

    Sorry my opinon is great action , not bad base line story but someone comented about the lack of use of Mickey Rourk in Ironman 2 . i say the same goes for Kingsley – as the evil guy , i think he could possibly have nocked it out of the park like Heath Ledgers Joker . but they did this shift that those who have seen it ….. sorry just missuses the character as a puppet . not cool . why Marvel lets these guys mess up some of the biggest villans is beyond me . Mandarin just became a clown . Venom was a throw in for Spiderman ( really .. you could have done 2 movies with Venom messing with Spiderman from the shadows untill jumping out at him on a third . And yes lets not forget an Earth devouring cloud called Galactus in Fantastic four . Also even IF it does come to be the Last solo flight for Ironman they could have still ended with a little plot clue that AIM was just testing the waters for something else ! ( what I would have done ) you don’t have to do the story . no one says you have to but it keeps us talking and wanting more . I liked it but feel the Avengers is way better . You gotta have great villans to have a great hero and i just think they wasted one . and yes i do understand the whole plot and underlying story of Tony coaping with so much in his life . that is the best part of the movie . He is a hero even without the suit or SHIELD to back him up . i think they could have added at the end , Fury telling him they where busy elsewhere and knew he could handle things on his own .

  5. SamuraiWalker says:

    The movie was great. I say watch it in 3D. since so many spoilers are in here already, I’m just gonna say its a big Nerd Troll. They throw one Ironman story line at you and then pull up another one. (no more spoilers) That’s mainly what bothered me. Nonetheless it was a good movie. Character wise, exactly what I would expect from Ironman post Avengers war. First your on top of the world, super rich genius with near indestructible armor. Then you meet a Super Soldier, an Alien Norse God, some very capable super agents, and the Hulk yea you feel kinda average after that. Then you nearly die in a war against aliens yea I would be having problems too.

  6. So, y’all, should I spend the extra shekels to see this film in 3D? @Bob re: “black-washed” – probably not, since Nick Fury was portrayed as looking like Samuel L. Jackson in 2002, Ultimates #1 comic book, predating the relevant film appearances.

  7. Bob says:

    Not to get technical, but I don’t think that the term “white-washing” makes any sense when applied to Kingsley-as-Mandarin, even though the accusation has been frequently applied.

    Shouldn’t it be “Indian-washing”? That doesn’t seem to have the same ring to it… especially since the accusation is meant to imply pro-white racism. It seems clear in retrospect that Kingsley was chosen because he is simply the best actor for the job.

    Follow-up: Was Nick Fury “black-washed” when they cast Samuel L. Jackson?

  8. RG says:

    There’s a lot of stuff in the film which undercuts expectations and reins in new ideas of how superhero films should be handled in a modern setting; which tropes make them what they are, and which tropes simply don’t work anymore. This is particularly evident with the course the Mandarin’s story takes (which is absolutely amazing), and just who turns out to save the day.

    No spoilers, but I’ll say this: this film makes the point that, when discussing issues of, let’s call it, “equality in strong roles,” sometimes quality is better than quantity.

    @CJ, I think the rumor is that it’s his last appearance in an Iron Man film… not his last appearance as the character.

  9. CJ says:

    IRON MAN 3 – an improvement over the 2nd Film, because it wasn’t rushed into production like the 2nd Film was (in my opinion? – while THE AVENGERS was brought to the screen – this gave more time for the 3rd IRON MAN Film to be written, filmed, produced then what the 2nd Film was given) …

    The last of Robert Downey Jr as IRON MAN? Only if his character doesn’t return to THE AVENGERS sequel(s) and / or doesn’t show up in one of the stand-alone Films featuring a MARVEL Character (ie Thor, Hulk, Spider Man, etc) …

    It’s up to Robert Downey Jr whatever he wants to do (& get paid a shit load of lucre to do). Poor mate hasn’t had thee time to think about a 3rd Film as Sherlock Holmes (lol) …

    Everyone have fun @ the cinema (regardless of whatever is your favorite film this summer)

  10. Dan Casey says:

    @KrazyJoe, I respectfully disagree with your assessment.

    @boB, I think that it’s a good movie and I had my issues with it, but I will absolutely watch it whenever it’s on. But that’s not the abiding point of this review – not by a longshot.

    @Inno, I agree. I’m eager to watch it again to see how it holds up a second time.

  11. Inno says:

    Saw it in IMAX 3D last week and, man, it might not hit me like the Avengers did, but it’s not far off it. And I think it’ll stand up to more rewatches than the Avengers will. The script was sharp, and I loved how they dealt with the Mandarin.

  12. boB says:

    Is this review trying to make the point that the first Iron Man isn’t a great movie? I think it was, and is, the best superhero movie made to date.

  13. Krazy Joe says:

    “The House that Robert Downey Jr. built suffered a bit of a misstep in 2010′s Iron Man 2, a hollow affair that missed the mark and thoroughly wasted Mickey Rourke. ”

    Iron Man 2 was better than the first one!