Doug Dorst had JJ Abrams on the phone. Though heâs an accomplished novelist and his work has appeared in McSweeneyâs, Ploughshares, ZYZZYVA, and other journals, as well as in the anthologies Significant Objects and Politically Inspired, having JJ Abrams on the phone was a whole different beast.
âItâs not the sort of call one has very often,â he said. Abrams had contacted Dorst about collaborating on a new project. But Abrams is known for his work on the screen â big and small â and Dorst works in less technological media. It makes sense though: JJ Abrams wanted to make a book. More than a book, really; S. is kind of an interactive analog reading experience.
Readers get a book in a box with a seal they must break. Ship of Theseus is the 1940s-era library book (Dewey Decimal code and all) inside. The novel, attributed to a âV.M. Straka,â is riddled with handwritten marginalia and stuffed with ephemera like postcards and college newspaper clippings exchanged between Eric and Jen, two readers who got their hands on the book before you did.
âNone of it was mapped out in advance.â Dorst works improvisationally, encountering the story as he goes along. âItâs very different than TV or screenwriting where everything is mapped out to the beat,â Dorst said. âBut I donât approach fiction that way.â
Even the ephemera included in the book was dreamt up along the way.
âWe talked about including that stuff from the beginning,â Dorst said. âI was always on the lookout for additional objects. I just made a wish list.â
There are 20 or so different things tucked in the pages of the book, narrowed down from Dorstâs wish list of about 100 things.
âI got deeply involved in this world where thereâs a lot of eggheaded, arcane, academic material. I went pretty far down that rabbit hole. Iâm a little bit of an egghead academic,â Dorst admitted. Makes sense â heâs a graduate of the Iowa Writersâ Workshop and a former Wallace Stegner Fellow at Stanford, and he has received Fellowships from the Michener-Copernicus Society and the National Endowment for the Arts. He also teaches writing at Texas State University in San Marcos.
Despite the inclination towards the more obtuse end of the nerd spectrum, the final product is totally accessible to non-academics with only a passing familiarity with the âpublish or perishâ paradigm.
But the post cards and hand drawn maps are only part of the experience; Ship of Theseus is annotated on nearly every page in different colored inks by two readers who seem to have met through the book, and who get to know one another passing it back and forth with notes added. This makes for a complex reading experience: thereâs the novel itself, which includes its own footnotes, and then the story unfolding in the margins.
In terms of how to approach the book, Dorst said, âI donât recommend any particular way, itâs really how do you best absorb information? Whatâs the most immersive reading experience you can give yourself?â
Thereâs any number of ways to approach it.
âSome people read Ship of Theseus entirely and then do a second pass for the margins,â Dorst said. âThereâs an infinite number of ways you might read the thing, and neither JJ nor I would want to control that reader experience.â
One could even do multiple passes, as it becomes apparent that Jen and Ericâs relationship progresses and make new discoveries as time goes by and their pens change color.
âThe colors was part of an organizational system that I used,â Dorst said. âIt was also kind of a concession to artifice, to do the inks in that way.â
Jen and Eric start out using blue and black pens, eventually switching to green and orange, and finally using red and purple ink. Itâs possible to see the color changes representing a progression in their relationship, from strangers passing notes in a book to something much different.
âItâs a guide that the reader benefits from,â Dorst thought. âItâs also not outside the bounds of reality, that they might lose their pens and pick up new ones.â
Maintaining that sense of a believable reality was important to Dorst and Abrams in creating the book. It was imperative that the thing be a believable literary artifact that could conceivably have been stolen and defaced by readers before you.
âPart of that illusion is that Straka [the novelâs apparent author] is recognizably Straka,â Dorst said of having to alter his writerâs voice for the project. Readers might pick up a hint of Kafka, touches of Nabokov, a little bit of Lovecraft, even shades of Saramago in reading the novel. But Dorst made a point of working towards a unique voice for V.M. Straka. âI went out of my way to sound less like me,â he admitted.
As for the larger architecture of the story within a story, wherein Eric and Jen seek to solve a larger mystery surrounding Strakaâs work, Dorst embraced âthe fun of working in JJ-land. Mysteries are part of the fun there, and I gave myself permission in a way I never have before.â
S. heaps mysteries on top of mysteries. Dorst said, âI have no choice but to trust the readersâ focus. Itâs a little more demanding of the reader than a lot of whatâs out there. But we said, âletâs not be afraid of that. Letâs just tell the story the best we can in the most interesting way it can be told.â
I agree with you, Rik. I purchased the book last weekend and am usually a pretty quick and focused reader. This book has sent me through a loop! I get lost in the conversation between Jen and Eric and then lose focus on SOT. I’m looking forward to rereading this book several different ways before I finally put it on the shelf. I started out reading the entire thing, then I plan on reading just SOT, then reading the margin notes as the pen color progresses. It’s such a fascinating mystery with a literal side of love story.
my buddy’s step-mother makes $64/hr on the internet. She has been fired from work for 8 months but last month her pay was $18797 just working on the internet for a few hours. view
========================================
http://www.fb49.com
========================================
The hardest part to figure out is if I should read the main story of the book, Ship of Theseus, then go back and read the notations so I’d have an understanding of the story, or if I should read the book, taking every diversion and asterisk-marked notation as they come, or do I read the notes between Jen and Eric in order, going back through the book over and over as their narrative progressed. I’m enjoying it, but it’s slow going since you never get up to a good reading speed with all the speed bumps placed on every page.